We have been making improvements to the experience and performance of this page!
Skip to the results
13 Results filtered by...
Filter
Tags > framework Clear All

External Link
Fire Stations in Oregon Any location where fire fighters are stationed or based out of, or where equipment that such personnel use in carrying out their jobs is stored for ready use. Fire Departments not having a permanent location are included, in which case their location has been depicted at the city/town hall or at the center of their service area if a city/town hall does not exist. This dataset includes those locations primarily engaged in forest or grasslands fire fighting, including fire lookout towers if the towers are in current use for fire protection purposes. This dataset includes both private and governmental entities. Fire fighting training academies are also included. This dataset is comprised completely of license free data. The Fire Station dataset and the EMS dataset were merged into one working file. TGS processed as one file and then separated for delivery purposes. Records with "-DOD" appended to the end of the [NAME] value are located on a military base, as defined by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) military installations and military range boundaries. Text fields in this dataset have been set to all upper case to facilitate consistent database engine search results. All diacritics (e.g., the German umlaut or the Spanish tilde) have been replaced with their closest equivalent English character to facilitate use with database systems that may not support diacritics. The currentness of this dataset is indicated by the [CONTDATE] field. Based upon this field, the oldest record dates from 07/11/2006 and the newest record dates from 06/02/2008.
Tags fire stations framework oregon state fire marshal osfm preparedness
Updated
February 8 2024
Views
328

External Link
This is a dataset download, not a document. The Open
button will start the download.

This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. Monthly 30-year "normal" dataset covering Oregon, averaged over the climatological period 1991-2020. Contains spatially gridded average annual total precipitation at 800m (30 arc-second) grid cell resolution. Distribution of the point measurements to the spatial grid was accomplished using the PRISM model, developed and applied by Dr. Christopher Daly of the PRISM Climate Group at Oregon State University. This dataset is available free-of-charge on the PRISM website.
Tags climate framework oregon precipitation prism
Updated
March 7 2024
Views
276

External Link
This is a dataset download, not a document. The Open
button will start the download.

This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. Monthly 30-year "normal" dataset covering Oregon, averaged over the climatological period 1991-2020. Contains spatially gridded average daily mean temperature at 800m grid cell resolution. Distribution of the point measurements to the spatial grid was accomplished using the PRISM model, developed and applied by Dr. Christopher Daly of the PRISM Climate Group at Oregon State University. This dataset is available free-of-charge on the PRISM website.
Tags climate framework mean temperature oregon temperature
Updated
July 1 2023
Views
204

Administrative
External Link

US Postal Service Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) Codes are used throughout the United States to improve mail delivery. There are 479 unique 5-digit ZIP Codes in Oregon all starting with 97. All ZIP Codes are assigned and managed exclusively by the US Postal Service. There are three main categories of ZIP Codes - 1) Standard, 2) PO Box Only, 3) Unique for large commercial and government customers.

Each ZIP Code is assigned a preferred city name by the US Postal Service. NOTE - these city names may not correspond with the city limits or other jurisdiction boundaries of incorporated cities. There are other acceptable city names listed that may be used for mailing addresses for some ZIP Codes. There are also other city names to avoid using for mailing addresses. To verify the preferred, acceptable, or city names to avoid enter the ZIP Code in this tool from the US Postal Service - https://tools.usps.com/zip-code-lookup.htm?citybyzipcode

This is not a product of the US Postal Service. It was compiled by checking all numbers from 97000 - 97999 with the ZIP Code Lookup tool.

Most Standard and some PO Box Only ZIP Codes may also be listed as Census ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZTCA). NOTE - The ZTCA is only an approximation of a ZIP Code area based on the predominate ZIP Code of all housing units in each Census block. ZIP Codes actually follow lines of travel along letter carrier routes and are not polygons as shown by the ZTCA.

Tags address framework geohub oregon oregon framework and 1 more
Updated
September 8 2024
Views
224

External Link

This is a dataset download, not a document. The Open
button will start the download.

Oregon Geologic Data Compilation, release 7 (OGDC-7), compiled by Jon J. Franczyk, Ian P. Madin, Carlie J.M. Duda, and Jason D. McClaughry


This is a compressed file containing a File Geodatabase with multiple feature classes, metadata XML, and a PDF pamphlet.

The Oregon Geologic Data Compilation (OGDC) is a digital data collection of geologic studies created by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI). The purpose of the compilation is to integrate and make available the best available published geologic mapping for the state by combining maps and data into a single consistent and maintainable digital database. OGDC was first released by DOGAMI in 2004, with successive releases building either geographically or qualitatively on previous releases. OGDC-6 was published in 2015 and serves as the Oregon Geologic Data Standard for the state as a data element component of the Geosciences Theme within the Oregon Framework Themes. The release of OGDC-7 builds directly from data published in OGDC-6 by migrating the database structure to the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP) Geologic Map Schema (GeMS). DOGAMI has implemented the GeMS schema as the database standard for all geologic mapping projects published from 2019 onward to meet NCGMP requirements and to support the state’s contribution to standardized nationwide geologic content. The transition to OGDC-7 required migrating the existing OGDC statewide compilation to the GeMS format for streamlining future updates, data creation, and data maintenance. Additionally, the transition to GeMS adds fundamental geologic map point data (e.g., structural data, geochronology, and geochemistry) as comprehensive geospatial datasets not included as part of previous versions of OGDC.


Tags dogami framework geology oregon
Updated
July 1 2023
Views
131

External Link
This is a dataset download, not a document. The Open
button will start the download.

This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. Monthly 30-year "normal" dataset covering Oregon, averaged over the climatological period 1991-2020. Contains spatially gridded average daily minimum temperature at 800m grid cell resolution. Distribution of the point measurements to the spatial grid was accomplished using the PRISM model, developed and applied by Dr. Christopher Daly of the PRISM Climate Group at Oregon State University. This dataset is available free-of-charge on the PRISM website.
Tags climate framework minimum temperature oregon temperature
Updated
July 1 2023
Views
133

External Link

This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. This theme contains PLS lines for the State of Oregon. This PLS theme includes donation claims lands. Attributes in this theme show Township Range and Section values.

Tags 1994 cadastral framework oregon planning cadastre and 1 more
Updated
February 8 2024
Views
274

External Link

The data was collected from local jurisdictions in the state and then assembled into a single dataset. The attributes were generalized to a set of comp plan codes that could be applied to data from all jurisdictions. The list of state comp plan codes and their descriptions can be found in this metadata. Please contact the local jurisdictions for the more detailed (not generalized) data.

As of May 31, 2019 this feature class contains comprehensive plan data from 189 local jurisdictions. DLCD plans to continue adding to and updating this statewide comp plan dataset as they receive information from the local jurisdictions. New releases of this data by DLCD are planned for publication every 2 years. Note: This data layer has gaps in the data and is not complete for the entire state of Oregon. Participating cities and counties are listed below.

City data included:

Adams, Adrian, Albany, Amity, Arlington, Ashland, Athena, Aumsville, Aurora, Baker City, Bandon, Bay City, Bend, Burns, Canby, Cannon Beach, Canyonville, Carlton, Cave Junction, Central Point, Clatskanie, Coburg, Columbia City, Condon, Coos Bay, Corvallis, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Culver, Dallas, Depoe Bay, Detroit, Donald, Dufur, Dundee, Dunes City, Eagle Point, Enterprise, Eugene, Falls City, Florence, Garibaldi, Gaston, Gates, Gearhart, Gervais, Glendale, Gold Hill, Grants Pass, Grass Valley, Haines, Harrisburg, Hermiston, Hines, Hubbard, Huntington, Idanha, Independence, Jacksonville, Jefferson, Jordan Valley, Joseph, Junction City, Keizer, La Pine, Lafayette, Lakeview, Lebanon, Lincoln City, Lostine, Lowell, Lyons, Madras, Malin, Manzanita, Maupin, Medford, Metolius, Mill City, Millersburg, Milton-Freewater, Monmouth, Mosier, Mt. Angel, Myrtle Creek, Nehalem, Newberg, Newport, North Bend, Nyssa, Oakridge, Ontario, Paisley, Philomath, Phoenix, Prineville, Redmond, Richland, Riddle, Rockaway Beach, Rogue River, Roseburg, Salem, Scappoose, Scio, Scotts Mills, Seaside, Seneca, Shady Cove, Shaniko, Sheridan, Silverton, Sisters, Sodaville, St. Helens, St. Paul, Stanfield, Stayton, Sublimity, Sweet Home, Talent, Tangent, The Dalles, Tillamook, Turner, Umatilla, Vale, Veneta, Vernonia, Wallowa, Westfir, Wheeler, Willamina, Woodburn and all the cities in Metro.

County data included:

Baker, Benton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Coos, Crook, Deschutes, Douglas, Grant, Harney, Hood River, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine, Klamath, Lake, Lane, Linn, Malheur, Marion, Multnomah, Polk, Tillamook, Umatilla, Wallowa, Wasco, Washington and Yamhill

Tags admin boundaries comp plan comprehensive plan department of land conservation and development framework and 2 more
Updated
February 8 2024
Views
154

External Link
This is a dataset download, not a document. The Open
button will start the download.

This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. Monthly 30-year "normal" dataset covering Oregon, averaged over the climatological period 1991-2020. Contains spatially gridded average daily maximum temperature at 800m grid cell resolution. Distribution of the point measurements to the spatial grid was accomplished using the PRISM model, developed and applied by Dr. Christopher Daly of the PRISM Climate Group at Oregon State University. This dataset is available free-of-charge on the PRISM website.
Tags climate framework maximum temperature oregon prism and 1 more
Updated
July 1 2023
Views
112

External Link
This Zoning feature class is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework statewide, Zoning spatial data. This version is authorized for public use. Attributes include zoning districts that have been generalized to state classes. As of June 30, 2023, this feature class contains zoning data from 229 local jurisdictions. DLCD plans to continue adding to and updating this statewide zoning dataset as they receive zoning information from the local jurisdictions. Jurisdictions included in the latest version of the statewide zoning geodatabase:
Cities: Adams, Adrian, Albany, Amity, Antelope, Ashland, Astoria, Athena, Aurora, Banks, Barlow, Bay City, Beaverton, Bend, Boardman, Bonanza, Brookings, Brownsville, Burns, Butte Falls, Canby, Cannon Beach, Carlton, Cascade Locks, Cave Junction, Central Point, Chiloquin, Coburg, Columbia City, Coos Bay, Cornelius, Corvallis, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Culver, Dayton, Detroit, Donald, Drain, Dufur, Dundee, Dunes City, Durham, Eagle Point, Echo, Enterprise, Estacada, Eugene, Fairview, Falls City, Florence, Forest Grove, Fossil, Garibaldi, Gaston, Gates, Gearhart, Gervais, Gladstone, Gold Beach, Gold Hill, Grants Pass, Grass Valley, Gresham, Halsey, Happy Valley, Harrisburg, Helix, Hermiston, Hillsboro, Hines, Hood River, Hubbard, Idanha, Independence, Jacksonville, Jefferson, Johnson City, Jordan Valley, Junction City, Keizer, King City, Klamath Falls, La Grande, La Pine, Lafayette, Lake Oswego, Lebanon, Lincoln City, Lowell, Lyons, Madras, Malin, Manzanita, Maupin, Maywood Park, McMinnville, Medford, Merrill, Metolius, Mill City, Millersburg, Milton-Freewater, Milwaukie, Mitchell, Molalla, Monmouth, Moro, Mosier, Mount Angel, Myrtle Creek, Myrtle Point, Nehalem, Newberg, Newport, North Bend, North Plains, Nyssa, Oakridge, Ontario, Oregon City, Pendleton, Philomath, Phoenix, Pilot Rock, Port Orford, Portland, Prescott, Prineville, Rainier, Redmond, Reedsport, Rivergrove, Rockaway Beach, Rogue River, Roseburg, Rufus, Saint Helens, Salem, Sandy, Scappoose, Scio, Scotts Mills, Seaside, Shady Cove, Shaniko, Sheridan, Sherwood, Silverton, Sisters, Sodaville, Spray, Springfield, Stanfield, Stayton, Sublimity, Sutherlin, Sweet Home, Talent, Tangent, The Dalles, Tigard, Tillamook, Toledo, Troutdale, Tualatin, Turner, Ukiah, Umatilla, Vale, Veneta, Vernonia, Warrenton, Wasco, Waterloo, West Linn, Westfir, Weston, Wheeler, Willamina, Wilsonville, Winston, Wood Village, Woodburn, Yamhill.
Counties: Baker County, Benton County, Clackamas County, Clatsop County, Columbia County, Coos County, Crook County, Curry County, Deschutes County, Douglas County, Harney County, Hood River County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Josephine County, Klamath County, Lane County, Lincoln County, Linn County, Malheur County, Marion County, Multnomah County, Polk County, Sherman County, Tillamook County, Umatilla County, Union County, Wasco County, Washington County, Wheeler County, Yamhill County.
R emaining jurisdictions either chose not to share data to incorporate into the public, statewide dataset or did not respond to DLCD’s request for data. These jurisdictions’ attributes are designated “not shared” in the orZDesc field and “NS” in the orZCode field.
Tags adminboundariesframework dept. of land conservation and development dlcd framework oregon and 3 more
Updated
March 30 2024
Views
161